Multiple Arousal Theory Picard Commentaries
by
, ,
Abstract - We respond to the commentaries of Critchley & Nagai, Mendes, Norman, Sabatinelli, and Richter. We agree that a theory needs to make predictions and we elaborate on the predictions we made so far. We do not agree that arousal has to have a precise definition in order to present theory about it;however, we do provide concrete answers to questions raised about Multiple Arousal Theory.
WP-02
Date of Publication:
30 November -0001
30 November -0001
Year of Publication:
2015
2015
@article{sensecare:509,
- author = {Rosalind W. Picard and Szymon Fedor and Yadid Ayzenberg},
- title = {Multiple Arousal Theory Picard Commentaries},
- year = {2015},
- date = {November 30, -0001},
Rosalind W. Picard and Szymon Fedor and Yadid Ayzenberg 2015 Multiple Arousal Theory Picard Commentaries November 30, -0001
Click on the link under to view document:
Workpackages
WP2 Affective Computing (AC) & Machine Learning
Related Articles
Document
Multiple Arousal Theory and EDA Asymmetry
Rosalind W. Picard, Szymon Fedor, Yadid Ayzenberg
Document
MIT Media Lab AC Current and Past Project
MIT researchers led by Rosalind Picard researchers led by
Document
ACM Physiological Computing and BCI
Erin Treacy Solovey, Daniel Afergan, Evan M. Peck, Samuel W. Hincks, Robert J. K. Jacob
Document
A Cognitive-Affective System Theory of Personality
Walter Mischel, Yuichi Shoda, Columbia University
Document
Dynamic Emotion Wheel_ Emotion Self-Report and Awareness Tool
Swiss Centre for Affective Sciences for
Document
Automatic Detection of Engagement Kinect
Hamed Monkaresi, Nigel Bosch, Rafael Calvo, Sidney D'Mello
Document
Auto Detection of Chronic Pain Expressions
Min S. H. Aung, Sebastian Kaltwang, Bernardino Romera-Paredes, Brais Martinez, Aneesha Singh, Matteo Cella, Michel Valstar, Hongying Meng, Andrew Kemp, Moshen Shafizadeh, Aaron C. Elkins, Natalie Kanakam, Amschel de Rothschild de, Nick Tyler, Paul J. Watson, Amanda C. de C. Williams de, Maja Pantic, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze